If I would describe myself in one word, it would be ‘pretty good at bejeweled.’ This may not seem like a contentious issue with most folk, but it drives an absolute wedge between me and some others I know. My darling wife, for instance, tries her best to do well at bejeweled, but (bless her) it is like watching National Geographic when that newborn wildebeest is spotted by the pack of Cape hunting dogs. Sure you think she has a chance, evading one dog, getting a sparkly gem, and being within a sprint of the rest of the herd, but then it happens: there is a second of inability to find a three-gem combination allowing the rest of the dogs to catch up and wrap their teeth around her legs. When the final gem explosion happens, there is little left but bones and the sound of distant hoofs as the dogs leave sated from their fest. The vultures soon swoop in wondering if she should have held onto the fiver gem until she was stuck.
And then there is my brother. Oh, yes, I got both of them to start playing, but only one plays via
Facebook, which tracks your high score and compares you to your ‘friends’. Poor, poor brother of mine, he had no chance! I know he thinks he is awesome at video games and all, but you know all those years while you were a teenager and all and were out skipping school, toking up, and hanging out with girls? Well, I
didn’t do any of those things, but instead I played video games. And I am good. Damn good. Sure, I have nothing on the younger crop of pasty virgins sitting in their mother’s basement playing
WoW, but I still am damn good. So, don’t feel so bad about me being better than you, because while I may be able to lord over you with my ‘awesome in Bejeweled’ accomplishments, you probably beat me in the ‘actually having touched a female breast in high school’ part of life.
Sadly, Bejeweled has been down on
Facebook the last day or so because they’
ve been having problems with it not recording some scores (including two of my high scores over 125k), so instead of the time in which I normally play it, I will sit back and reflect on it. Either that or I will gloat over my newest high score.
Yeah, I’ll pick that second option.
This past week has been a real eye-opener for me; I have decided to give up my non-believing ways! I have had a revelation, and now I know there is a God because I. am. him.

200k! It was a game of a lifetime, one that I WILL tell my grandchildren about (I’
ve already told my children). I was playing and everything was just going well, when I looked down at the score and time for a split second. That, by the way, is almost always a bad idea because it throws you off, takes you away from the game, and gives you more pressure. But I just HAD to. I got the double score early, and then the triple and quadruple in short order (never got the quintuple one, oddly considering my score), and I needed to know! So when I looked down, I noticed I had 25 seconds left and was already on 130k. Oh shit, ‘just don’t mess up’ was the thought in my head (well, ‘just don’t fuck up’ actually, but I don’t want to cuss on the blog) and I
didn’t! Wow, it was pure awesome, and afterwards I showed Laura, took the screenshot, wiped off, and called a couple people to tell them about it.
The thing with a score that high is that there is a tremendous amount of luck involved, but no amount of luck will put you in the situation to get the high score if you suck. A favorite quote of mine that I get from Baseball Prospectus (don’t know where they get it and I can’t be bothered to Google it) is ‘luck is the residual of good design’, though you can substitute ‘good skill’ for ‘good design’ in this case. If you play enough time you will get a really high score, but the chances of you getting a really high score are better if you are better. Yeah, me
explainy good not today, I know.
But, am I really that good, or just luck? I decided to run the numbers and compare me, Laura, and Paul’s scores. Here are the number of times we scored in each of the following categories (note that each category is mutually exclusive, so if I score in 50k it does not show up as also 25k).

Neato stuff. First thing that jumps out is ‘holy shit you guys play a lot’, but most of my playing is when I am doing audio-only Italian, so it
isn’t totally wasted time. Also, these are conservative estimates of games because they don’t count the ‘under 25k’ games (which are rare for me anyway).
It got me thinking: What would be a good measure of one’s overall skill in bejeweled? At first I thought of a 25k:100+k ratio, but that
wouldn’t work for people like my brother who would be in infinity (keep at it bro, you’ll break 100k one of these day! Same with you
Jos Weldon!). 25k:50k might work well, since it show the relative amount of low to medium scores, but it still
doesn’t grab me as a good measure.
I decided to go with the 25k:75+k ratio as a measure of ‘Bejeweled quality’ (
BQ). Here is my thinking: 25k is reasonably easy to get and the lowest score tallied, so it should be the baseline for ‘weak’ scores. 50k is good, but relatively easy to get, so we’ll ignore it. 75k has the advantage of being relatively difficult to get, but not so prohibitively difficult (like over 100k for some people) that it would be impossible to compare the novices to ‘spends way too much time’ players. And even though it won’t really effect the numbers that much, I’ll lump everything over 75 into the 75 category to get better definition.
So how does this measure work out? Remember, the smaller the number the better:
Me: 1.968
Paul: 4.721
Laura: 11.545
Unfortunately the game is down so I can’t see my brother (or
Joslyne’s) data. What this means is for about every two games that I only score 25k (to 50k) in, I also score one high scoring game (over 75k), while it takes Laura almost six times as long to get a higher scoring game.
Now I have devised a good measure of
BQ, once the game comes back up we can compare each other.
I really don’t have a good closing for this piece, so I’ll leave with a punch line from a dirty joke that I mangled trying to tell my friend when I was 10: “if he’s up that far honey, then I can’t help you.”